Legal Opinion

Burdo v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Chelmsford

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 15, 2018No. 17-P-970Published

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants, Terrance and Valerie Murphy (the Murphys), appeal from an amended judgment of the Land Court which annulled a variance that had been issued to them by the Zoning Board of Appeals of Chelmsford (board). They claim that the judge erred by finding, without evidentiary support, that the plaintiffs have standing and that the two lots at issue merged for zoning purposes. We affirm.

Background. On August 30, 2012, the board granted the Murphys a variance from the town of Chelmsford's zoning bylaw's setback requirement in connection with the proposed construction of a home on a vacant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New England Canteen Service, Inc. v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Shirley Wayside Ltd. Partnership v. Board of Appeals of ShirleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. Kenner v. Zoning Board of Appeals of ChathamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  4. Paulding v. BruinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  5. Bruzzese v. Board of Appeals of HinghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API