Legal Opinion

Mejia v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2006No. 43833PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Gibbons, J.:

In this case, we consider a number of issues including whether a social worker’s interview requires that Miranda1 warnings be given. We conclude that Miranda-like warnings are not required because conditioning a child custody placement recommendation upon honest answers to a social worker’s questions does not cut off an individual’s free choice to exercise the right to remain silent.

FACTS

Appellant Inmer Mejia and the victims’ mother were married in early 2003. After the wedding, Mejia moved in with the mother and her two daughters from a prior marriage, A.W.,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Pellegrini v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Green v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Diomampo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Thompson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Dickey v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Chavez (Edilfredo) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Saintal v. FosterDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API