Chavez (Edilfredo) v. State

application of the law to those facts de novo. Lacier v. Warden, 121 Nev. 682, 686,

120 P.3d 1164, 1166

(2005). First, appellant argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate the condition of a window to ascertain if the window lock was actually broken. The victim stated that appellant crawled through a bedroom window that had a broken lock and did so because the bedroom door was locked. Appellant fails to demonstrate that his trial counsel's performance was deficient or that he was prejudiced. The victim testified that the incidents where appellant crawled through a…