Legal Opinion
Wallace & Tiernan Inc. v. General Electric Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 7, 1968No. 67 Civ. 4991PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKEL, District Judge.
Defendant, General Electric Company, holds as assignee a patent, No. 2,888,424, granted in 1959, which is adequately described for present purposes in defendant’s Memorandum (p. 2) as being “directed to a curable, cross-linkable composition of (1) polyethylene (2) a defined peroxide and (3) a specified filler. Its claims cover that three-membered composition, before and after curing, and the process of curing such a composition.” (Defendant’s emphasis.) All United States manufacturers of such compositions have taken licenses under the patent. The overwhelming…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Boris SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Sherwood Medical Industries, Inc. v. Deknatel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Components, Inc. v. Western Electric CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1979
- Tubeco, Inc. v. Crippen Pipe Fabrication CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.