Legal Opinion

Tukovits v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 1996No. 00811PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

This is a timely appeal from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee on February 1, 1995. For the reasons below, we affirm.

The facts may be summarized as follows: In 1984, Joseph Tukovits’ insurance policy with The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Prudential) became subject to the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law of 1984 (MVFRL).1 At that time, Mr. Tukovits’ insurance policy provided uninsured motorist/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage in the amount of $15,000 each person, $30,000…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Accu-Weather, Inc. v. Prospect Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Johnson v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Schriver v. MazziottiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Botsko v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Harber Philadelphia Center City Office Ltd. v. LPCI Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Salazar v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API