for Incorporation of City & Borough of Yakutat v. Local Boundary Commission
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice, pro tern.
I. INTRODUCTION
A group of Yakutat residents designating themselves as the Petitioners for the Incorporation of the City and Borough of Yakutat (Petitioners) filed a petition for incorporation of the City and Borough of Yakutat. The Local Boundary Commission (LBC) voted to approve the petition, but altered the northwestern boundary of the proposed borough. Petitioners appealed to the superior court, challenging the LBC’s decision to redraw the proposed borough’s northwestern boundary.
After the superior court affirmed the LBC’s decision, Petitioners filed this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Rydwell v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Forest v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Alaska Transportation Commission v. Airpac, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Fowler v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mullins v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- State of Alaska, Office of Lieutenant Governor, Division of Elections and Director Gail Fenumiai, in an official capacity v. Recall DunleavyAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Mallott v. Stand for SalmonAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Association of Village Council Presidents Regional Housing Authority v. Dietrich Mael, on his own behalf and on behalf of his minor children, D.K., and E.M. Thomas Mael and Rose Mael v. State of Alaska, Dietrich Mael v. Association of Village Council Presidents and State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- City & Borough of Juneau v. State, Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.