Legal Opinion

City & Borough of Juneau v. State, Local Boundary Commission

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2015No. 7067 S-15502/S-15512Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The primary issue in this appeal is whether the State of Alaska's Local Boundary Commission (Boundary Commission) violated the Alaska Constitution when it approved the incorporation of a new borough over the objection of an existing borough seeking to annex some of the area included in the new borough. We conclude that the Boundary Commission's decision complied with constitutional requirements and therefore affirm the superior court's decision upholding the Boundary Commission's incorporation decision.

IH. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In April 2011 the City of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. City of Nome v. Catholic Bishop of Northern AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Rosen v. State Board of Public AccountancyAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API