City & Borough of Juneau v. State, Local Boundary Commission
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINFREE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The primary issue in this appeal is whether the State of Alaska's Local Boundary Commission (Boundary Commission) violated the Alaska Constitution when it approved the incorporation of a new borough over the objection of an existing borough seeking to annex some of the area included in the new borough. We conclude that the Boundary Commission's decision complied with constitutional requirements and therefore affirm the superior court's decision upholding the Boundary Commission's incorporation decision.
IH. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In April 2011 the City of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Nome v. Catholic Bishop of Northern AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Rosen v. State Board of Public AccountancyAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.