Legal Opinion

O'Carroll v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 20, 1998No. 87646PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMA WILSON, Justice:

¶ 1 Pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.1991, §§ 1601, et seq., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma certified the following question of state law to this Court:

Is the requirement to file an amended Oklahoma income tax return under Okla. Stat. Tit. 68, § 2375(H)(2) (1991), after adjustment of a taxpayer’s federal income tax liability, dependent upon Okla.Stat. Tit. 68, § 2375(H)(1) (1991) to the extent that the requirement arises only if the taxpayer executed an agreement with the Internal Revenue Service…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. MacY v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Sharp v. Tulsa County Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Dugger v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Price v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Neer v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Thomas v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Compsource Mut. Ins. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  4. COMPSOURCE MUTUAL INSUR. CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLA. TAX COMM. and OKLA. ASSOC. OF ELECTRIC SELF INSURERS FUND v. STATE OF OKLA. TAX COMM.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. Comerford v. Pryor FoundryCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API