Legal Opinion

White v. Dalton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1937No. 26018PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

The plaintiff in a trover case (where the defendant does not at the first term comply with the provisions of the Code, § 107-104, by tendering the property to the plaintiff, etc.), has, at his option, the right to demand a verdict for the property alone, and its hire if any, or for damages alone. “Having a right to elect between a verdict for damages and a verdict for the property, he thus has a further right to elect in what way his damages shall be made up.” O’Neill Mfg. Co. v. Woodley, 118 Ga. 114, 116 (44 S. E. 980). That is, these damages may, at his option, consist of the highest proved…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elder v. Woodruff Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. O'Neill Manufacturing Co. v. WoodleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Drury v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Fussell v. Heard & FullingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Goodson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hunnicutt v. HunnicuttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Equitable Credit & Discount Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API