Hunnicutt v. Hunnicutt
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
The single issue is whether the jury verdict is inconsistent as a matter of law.
Plaintiff brought suit seeking to recover certain personalty from defendants. When the case was tried before a jury the issues were whether plaintiff was entitled to: certain property plus rental, damages plus interest for other property, and expenses of litigation. The jury returned a verdict permitting plaintiff to recover the property but without any rental, $7,500 damages without the imposition of any interest, and $7,772.12 for expenses of litigation.
Motion for directed verdict favoring…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. FrachiseurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Acker v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Calhoun v. Babcock Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Bagwell v. Sportsman Camping CentersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- White v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Continental Research Corp. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Famble v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Barber v. H & H Muller Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Calhoun v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.