Legal Opinion

Equitable Credit & Discount Co. v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 12, 1949No. 32382PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

The automobile which is the basis of the present suit is owned by the defendants unless their title is affected by the facts alleged in the petition. The theory of the petition is that, even though the original owners (the defendants) lost'possession of the automobile by the criminal or fraudulent acts of a third person (Johnson)—the giving of a forged check or the stopping of payment on the check—yet the defendants are estopped by their own acts and, or, their own negligence from asserting their title against the plaintiff, which is a bona fide purchaser for value and took the automobile…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Capital Automobile Co. v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Patterson Co. v. Peoples Loan & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Southern Railway Company v. LileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  5. White v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dell v. KugelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. Harris v. AckermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. Republic Mortgage Corp. v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Davison v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Northwestern Fire & Marine Insurance v. PeekCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API