Legal Opinion

Savastano v. Nurnberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 1989PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lawrence, J.

This appeal concerns the right of the defendants to authorize the transfers of involuntarily admitted mentally ill patients, without their consent or a prior judicial hearing, from municipal facilities to psychiatric facilities operated by the New York State Office of Mental Health. We find that the statutory and regulatory scheme (see, Mental Hygiene Law § 29.11; 14 NYCRR 517.4) which permits the challenged transfers does not violate the Due Process Clause of either the US Constitution (US Const, 14th Amend, § 1) or the NY Constitution (NY Const, art I, § 6).

I

T…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Winner v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People ex rel. Noel B. v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re Jerome G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. New Amber Auto Service, Inc. v. New York City Environmental Control BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In re Douglas Z.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API