Legal Opinion
New Amber Auto Service, Inc. v. New York City Environmental Control Board
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Walter B. Tolub, J.
Plaintiffs, New Amber Auto Service, Inc. (New Amber) and Spin Holdings, Inc., doing business as Jack’s Place (Spin Holdings), move for a judgment (1) declaring section 24-141 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York unconstitutional; (2) declaring section 3.3 (a) of the New York City Environmental Control Board’s Rules and Regulations (15 RCNY 31-53 [a]) unconstitutional; and (3) awarding each plaintiff remission of its fine and counsel fees.
In the alternative, plaintiff New Amber seeks a judgment pursuant to CPLR article 78 on the ground that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burke v. DenisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Spaid v. Liverpool Central School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1996