Legal Opinion
King v. Smith
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 16, 1972No. 8 Div 454PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAWSON, Justice.
This appeal from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Lawrence County was submitted here on motion and on merits.
Motion
Appellee has moved that appellants’ brief be stricken because it fails to comply with Supreme Court Rule 8 in two respects and for the reason that it contains “purported affidavits of various persons” which were not in evidence.
Supreme Court Rule 8, which relates to “Forms and Length of Briefs,” provides in part: “Typewritten briefs shall be on white paper, eight and one-half inches by eleven inches, with a margin one and one-half inches, and typewritten…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Coleman v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Morton v. National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atlas Auto Finance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Nelson v. HammondsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Ex Parte AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ex Parte BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Ex Parte Guaranty Pest Control, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Stephens v. Central of Georgia R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Geer Bros., Inc. v. WalkerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Wilson v. Crosby Lumber Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.