Legal Opinion

Botvinick v. RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 24, 2009No. 08-1966PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TINDER, Circuit Judge.

After Bradley Botvinick completed his residency in anesthesiology at Rush University Medical Center (“Rush”), he obtained employment with Anesthesiology Associates of Dunedin (“AAD”), a Florida doctors’ association. Botvinick lost that job, however, when the hospital where AAD doctors practice denied Botvinick’s application for clinical privileges. Believing that Rush sabotaged his application by feeding the hospital false, petty information about his reputation, Botvinick sued Rush and several of its doctors for tortious interference with his expectation of employment.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rafael Sanjuan and Marcello A. Maviglia v. The American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., and Stephen C. ScheiberCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hampton v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Zayre Corporation v. S.M. & R. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. MetroPCS v. DevorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Pampered Chef v. AlexanianDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. United States v. Triad Isotopes, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  4. Ricco v. Southwest Surgery Center, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  5. Loggerhead Tools, LLC v. Sears Holding Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API