Legal Opinion
Scott v. Parham
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided June 30, 1976No. Civ. A. C75-614APublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDENFIELD, Chief Judge.
This action challenging the state and federal administration of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701, et seq., is before this court for a ruling on plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary and permanent injunction. In its order of December 2, 1975, 69 F.R.D. 324, this court tentatively certified this case as a class action, and on that same date, the court held an evidentiary- hearing on plaintiffs’ motions. In its order of March 81, 1976, the court found that the plaintiffs had established a prima facie case of unreasonableness in the state…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. ParhamDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marshall v. SwitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Hedgepeth v. North Carolina Division of Services for the BlindCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Schornstein v. New Jersey Division of Vocational Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Marshall v. SwitzerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- Marshall v. SwitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.