Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Switzer
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided October 4, 1995No. 92-CV-747 (FJS) (DNH)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SCULLIN, District Judge:
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that his rights under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 were violated by defendants Switzer and Gloeekler. At the time of the alleged violation, defendant Swit-zer, who is being sued in his individual capacity, was serving as Deputy Commissioner of the New York State Office of Vocational Rehabilitation. Defendant Gloeekler, who is being sued in both his individual and official capacities, presently serves as defendant Switzer’s successor in the position of Deputy…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kuck v. DanaherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Mercer v. Dora B. Schriro, Comm'r of the Dep't of Emergency Servs. & Pub. Prot., the Conn. State Police Union, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Davidson v. ScullyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Adler v. PatakiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002
- Peddle v. SawyerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.