Legal Opinion
People v. Buckles
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1943No. Civ. 6848PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
Respondent State of California commenced an action against defendants Rex W. Buckles and Elizabeth Lucille Buckles and defendant and appellant Midland Chevrolet Company to recover sales taxes. Defendants Buckles defaulted and judgment was entered against them. Appellant Midland Chevrolet Co. contested the action and after trial upon an agreed statement of facts, a judgment was entered against appellant and this appeal is from said judgment.
Defendants Buckles were engaged in the business of conducting a Chevrolet automobile agency at Woodland, California, under the name of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. HochwenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Crocker-Woolworth National Bank v. CarleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Ahlgren v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Joy v. RousseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Berylwood Investment Co. v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Knudsen Dairy Products Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Schnyder v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Century Geophysical Corp., a Corporation, and v. California Board of Equalization, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Century Geophysical Corp., a Corporation, and v. California Board of Equalization, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977