Legal Opinion

Berylwood Investment Co. v. Graham

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1941No. Civ. No. 11312PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

Two separate appeals are presented from a judgment as modified on defendants’ motion for new trial. The first involves the construction of an agreement as it bears upon the liability of vending stockholders for federal income tax for a period antedating the sale; and the second, assuming such liability, the question whether the act of a national bank in participating in such agreement as testamentary trustee under the will of one of such stockholders, was ultra vires.

The facts of the ease are as follows: Prior to July, 1928, the Italo Petroleum Corporation of America, hereinafter referred to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Ohio v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1893

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. Emerson-Comstock Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1956
  2. Pratt v. Robert S. Odell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Western Petroleum Co. v. First Bank Aberdeen (N.A.)South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Woodrum v. CowanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Joseph W. Schoenfeld, and Gladys W. Schoenfeld v. R. E. Neher and Marjorie E. NeherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API