Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Walker

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1956No. Civ. 21632PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE (Paul), J. pro tem. *

The plaintiffs, as residents and taxpayers of the city of Monrovia, a city of the sixth class, seek a writ of mandate to compel the defendants, as the council of that city, to submit to a vote of the electorate of the city an initiative ordinance which by proper petition had been submitted to the defendants and which they have refused to adopt.

On filing of the petition, we issued an alternative writ and the defendants have made return to that writ by demurrer and by answer. In view of the conclusion that we have reached, that the general demurrer must be sustained,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Payne & Dewey v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Mervynne v. AckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Byre v. City of ChamberlainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Myers v. City Council of Pismo BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Ivens v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API