Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Department of Housing & Community Development

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1975No. Civ. 14527PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.

This is a mandate action in which the People, represented by the District Attorney of Nevada County, are the petitioner. Petitioner seeks a writ compelling the state Department of Housing and Community Development and its director to rescind a permit for the construction of a mobilehome park in Nevada City. Holder of the construction permit is Roy Ramey, who appears here as real party in interest. Petitioner alleges that the permit is invalid because issued without an environmental impact report (EIR) or negative declaration under the California Environmental…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Nutrition Now, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Asia Investment Co. v. BorowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Raley v. California Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Arcata National Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1976

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API