Legal Opinion
In Re Willing
California Supreme Court
Decided January 18, 1939No. Crim. 4185PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was arrested for violating section 737.5 of the Agricul tural Code, in that as a distributor he purchased fluid milk from a producer without obtaining a license from the state director of agriculture and furnishing a bond. The District Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, heretofore issued a writ, but after hearing dismissed the proceeding and remanded petitioner to custody. (In re Willing, 27 Cal. App. (2d) 367 [80 Pac. (2d) 1027].)
Petitioner contends that the section is unconstitutional class legislation for the reason that while…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Highland Farms Dairy, Inc. v. AgnewSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- BORDEN’S FARM PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. TEN EYCK, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE & MARKETS OF NEW YORK, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- People v. . Beakes Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- In Re CardinalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Ray v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Knudsen Creamery Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Wallace v. Consumers Cooperative of Berkeley, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.