Legal Opinion
Hando v. PPG Industries, Inc.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided July 25, 1995No. 94-457PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
Emma Jean Hando (Hando) appeals from an order of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, denying her motion for a new trial. We affirm.
The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the District Court abused its discretion in denying her motion for a new trial based on the improper admission of evidence regarding Spring Creek Coal Company (SCCC).
SCCC employed Hando as a control room operator at its mine in Decker, Montana. During a production break in the summer of 1981, SCCC assigned employees to various painting projects around the mine site. The paint, which was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hando v. PPG Industries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
- Tigh v. College Park Realty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1967
- Buhr on Behalf of Lloyd v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- King v. ZimmermanMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Pedersen v. NordahlMontana Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tanner v. Dream Island, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
- Murphy Homes, Inc. v. MullerMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- DeMars v. CarlstromMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Kneeland v. Luzenac America, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
- Lynch v. ReedMontana Supreme Court · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.