Legal Opinion

Buhr on Behalf of Lloyd v. Flathead County

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1994No. 92-061PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Allen Buhr appeals from judgments in favor of all defendants and from an order of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm.

Buhr presents the following issues:

1. Did the District Court properly instruct the jury regarding negligence per sel

a. Did the District Court err in instructing the jury on the statutory duties of Flathead County and Mental Health by quoting statutory language?

b. Did the District Court err by failing to instruct on each element of Buhr’s negligence per se claims?

c. Did the District Court fail to instruct the jury…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Azure Ex Rel. Marchington v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Barrett v. Asarco Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Costco WholesaleMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Tanner v. Dream Island, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Delaware v. K-Decorators, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Durden v. Hydro Flame Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Dorwart v. CarawayMontana Supreme Court · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API