Legal Opinion

DeMars v. Carlstrom

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1997No. 97-316PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

In May 1996, plaintiff and appellant, Cynthia DeMars, filed an action in the District Court for the Tenth Judicial District in Fergus County against Connie Carlstrom to recover damages she incurred as a result of a single vehicle automobile accident allegedly caused by Carlstrom’s negligence. Following trial, the jury returned a verdict finding DeMars comparatively negligent, and apportioning liability between the two parties. DeMars subsequently filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict pursuant to Rule 50(b), M.R.Civ.P, on the issue of liability. In the alternative, DeMars…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jacques v. Montana National GuardMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Barmeyer v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Werre v. DavidMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Martel v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Ryan v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Plath v. SchonrockMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Arrowhead Sch. Dist. 75, Park Co. v. KlyapMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Lee v. USAA Casualty InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API