Legal Opinion

Maine Mutual Fire Insurance v. Gervais

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 31, 1999PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] Rainald Gervais appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Marden, J.) denying Gervais’s request for reimbursement of the attorney fees he incurred in defending a declaratory judgment action brought by Maine Mutual Fire Insurance Co. to determine whether Maine Mutual had a duty to defend Gervais against emotional distress allegations in a suit filed by an injured employee of Gervais. Gervais contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for attorney fees because Maine Mutual’s duty to defend Gervais against the emotional distress allegations…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Gibson v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. Inhabitants of TopshamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Vigna v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. ACMAT Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Auto Europe, LLC v. Connecticut Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  3. Foremost Insurance v. LevesqueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  4. Barrett Paving Materials, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. PRIME TANNING CO., INC. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API