Legal Opinion
Puccinelli v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 27, 1925No. 4538PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
March 11, 1924, Joe Pueeinelli entered a plea of guilty to four informations under the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 1013814 et seq.) in eases numbered 2018, 2019, 2159, and 2162. The record does not disclose the exact nature of the offenses, but the several sentences were as follows: Case No. 2018, a fine of $500, without any order of commitment; ease No. 2019, a fine of $500 and imprisonment in the county jail for three months, and, in default of payment of the fine, a further term of imprisonment in the county jail for the period of five…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re WightSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Gagnon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. PattersonUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
- Rutland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Daugherty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Downey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Harry Joseph Payne v. Paul J. Madigan, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Alcatraz, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Subas v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Boyd v. ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Blankenship v. Royalty Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.