Legal Opinion

State v. Carver

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 6, 2004No. 88,888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

In America, the foundation of our liberty is due process of law. Underpinning that foundation, for those accused of crimes, are the twin rights of being present at all critical stages of a criminal prosecution and being free to retain counsel of choice. Because Robert M. Carver was denied both of those rights, we must reverse his convictions and remand the case for a new trial.

We briefly list some of the facts about the crimes involved and then show how the case was handled by the district court.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Richard Carver and Kimberly Buttel lived together in Wichita until they…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SewardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. VannSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. City of Wichita v. BannonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. State v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API