State v. Toney
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Buser, J.:
Marcus D. Toney appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his plea. In part, Toney contends his court-appointed public defender had an actual conflict of interest at the hearing on the motion. According to Toney, this conflict arose because one of the grounds for his motion to withdraw plea was that his public defender (who also represented him at the hearing on the motion) failed to properly investigate his case prior to the plea. Toney contends his public defender either failed to argue her own ineffectiveness at the hearing or faded to withdraw as counsel in order to testify…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SharkeySupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. PradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. HulettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.