Legal Opinion

Thomas and King, Inc. v. City of Phoenix

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 29, 2004No. 1 CA-CV 03-0302PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

¶ 1 Thomas and King, Inc. (“T & K”) appeals from the superior court’s judgment affirming the City of Phoenix Development Advisory Board’s (“Board”) denial of T & K’s Application for Modification from the Construction Code. The principal issue presented on appeal is whether a portion of a bar in a restaurant with moveable seats must be lowered to allow disabled patrons access pursuant to the 1997 Uniform Building Code (“UBC”). A second issue is whether T & K was entitled to a modification of any such requirement. We affirm the superior court’s correct application of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  3. City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. Groat v. Equity American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Johnson v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Ponderosa Fire District v. Coconino CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Cross v. Elected Officials Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Griffith Energy, L.L.C. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API