Legal Opinion

In Re Koper

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided October 31, 2002No. 19-30295PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON OBJECTIONS TO CONFIRMATION OF PLAN

ALBERT S. DABROWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.

I.INTRODUCTION

This matter presents the question whether a Chapter 13 debtor’s plan can provide for payment of the secured component of a bifurcated, non-homestead mortgage claim over a time period greater than the five-year maximum plan term allowed under Bankruptcy Code Section 1322(d).

This Court construes the relevant provisions of Chapter 13, as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court, to compel payment of the present value of the secured component of an undersecured creditor’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Rake v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. In Re McGregorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
  4. National City Bank v. Elliott (In Re Elliott)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Daly v. Deptula (In Re Carrozzella & Rechardson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re People v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  2. In re WimmerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. In Re StivenderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
  4. Bullard v. Hyde Park Savings BankBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2013
  5. In re BullardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API