Legal Opinion

In re Bullard

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 24, 2012No. 10-23503-WCHPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The matter before the Court is the “Objection to Confirmation of Third Amended Chapter 13 Plan” (the “Objection”) filed by Hyde Park Savings Bank (“Hyde Park”) and the “Response to Objection to Confirmation of Plan by Creditor Hyde Park Savings Bank” (the “Response”) filed by Louis B. Bullard (the “Debtor”). The question presented by the Objection is whether a debtor through his Chapter 13 plan may bifurcate a secured creditor’s claim and then pay the secured portion of the claim over a period longer than the maximum…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Lomas Mortgage, Inc. v. Esperandieu & Antonine LouisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re McGregorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
  5. In Re LegowskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bullard v. Blue Hills BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Bullard v. Hyde Park Savings BankBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2013
  3. In re CampbellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  4. In re FortinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  5. Shalonda M WhiteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API