State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. Monsees
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, J.
As we interpret the record before us, there is no controversy between the plaintiff and the defendant as to the amount of contributions due the Employment Security Commission, if it is determined the defendant is liable for contributions under the Employment Security Law. Likewise, if it is determined that Yestal Monsees, John Arville Cross, Clay Garrick, Joe Young, and Mozelle Tysinger were employees of C. R. Monsees within the meaning of the Employment Security Law, then it is conceded that the defendant had in his employ in each of twenty different weeks in the years involved, eight or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Unemployment Compensation Com. v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Young v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. KermonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. Hennis Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- In Re BeattySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953