Legal Opinion

MacKall v. Fleegle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 2002PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, P.J.E.

¶ 1 Appellant, Robert Fleegle, appeals from the Trial Court order dated September 6, 2001. After review, we affirm.

¶ 2 This matter arises out of a dispute over the ownership of a tract of land situated in Bedford County, Pennsylvania. The Trial Court summarized the facts of this case as follows.

The quiet title action before this Court was commenced on October 10, 2000 with the filing of [Mackall’s] Complaint. At a non-jury trial on June 11, 2001, the parties presented testimony by stipulation. Each party was given thirty (30) days to submit briefs detailing their positions. All…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Fanning v. DavneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Brookbank v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Bonavitacola v. CluverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Lawson v. SimonsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. K.H. v. J.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Consolidation Coal Co. v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Grossi v. Travelers Personal Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Keystone Dedicated Logistics, Inc. v. JGB Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. K.H. v. J.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API