Legal Opinion

State v. Mankin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 19, 2010No. 38977-1-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

¶1 The State appeals the trial court’s order requiring police officers to submit to depositions.1 The *115State argues that (1) pretrial defense interviews with police officers are private conversations that fall under RCW 9.73.030(l)(b) of the Washington State Privacy Act (Privacy Act) (ch. 9.73 RCW) and, therefore, defense counsel cannot record them without the consent of all parties; and (2) the trial court lacks authority to order such depositions under CrR 4.6(a) when police officer witnesses agree to give pretrial defense interviews but refuse to allow defense counsel to tape record them.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dillon v. Seattle Deposition Reporters, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. State v. McCabeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. State v. McCabeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. State of Washington v. Joseph Dean ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Jason Dillon, App. v. Seattle Deposition Reporters, Et Ano., Resps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API