Legal Opinion

American Motorists Insurance v. Blaylock

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 5, 1951No. 33536PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The testimony adduced on the hearing of this case is markedly similar to that found in Continental Casualty Co. v. Bennett, 69 Ga. App. 683 (26 S. E. 2d, 682), in which case the claimant, having suffered an apparently trivial eye injury, lost his vision some weeks later. The medical testimony in his favor was as follows: “Q. And, not having seen him until the late time you did, you can not, of course, state positively whether or not the accident brought on the loss of vision? A. No, sir. Q. But it is your testimony that it could have? A. That is a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Hall v. General Accident Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Ocean Accident Guarantee Corporation v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Manley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Davis v. Cobb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Fox v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Contract Harvesters v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Riegel Textile Corp. v. VinyardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API