Travelers Insurance v. Thornton
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action on accident-insurance policy. Before Judge Crisp,. City court of Americus. December 27, 1902.
1Opinion of the CourtLamar, J.
1, 2. Under the decision in Thornton v. Travelers Ins. Co., 116 Ga. 121, it was left for the jury to say whether the *456injury was caused by the fall, and aggravated by the hernia, or whether the hernia was a contributing cause to the injury. A physician could give an opinion on hypothetical facts, on what he had heard other witnesses testify in the case, or on facts discovered by his own investigation. He could state what, in his opinion, would have been the effect of the blow to the plaintiff without a hernia, and what the effect of the blow with the hernia. An expert can testify as to what…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thornton v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Marshall v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Mayor of Gainesville v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
3Cited by59 opinions
- Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- United States Casualty Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Hall v. General Accident Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Thomas v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1962
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.