Legal Opinion

Manley v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1928No. 6160PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hines,

J. (After stating the foregoing facts.)

The defendant was indicted under section 28 of article 20 of the banking act, which declares that “Every insolvency of a bank shall be deemed fraudulent, and the president and directors shall be severally punished by imprisonment and labor in the penitentiary for not less than one (1) year nor longer than ten (10) years: Provided, that the defendant in a case arising under this section may repel the presumption of fraud by showing that the affairs of the bank have been fairly and legally administered, and generally with the same care and diligence…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Hygrade Provision Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 1)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Manley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Thomas v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  3. Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  4. Ocean Accident Guarantee Corporation v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  5. James Burston v. E. B. Caldwell, Warden, Georgia State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API