Legal Opinion

Riegel Textile Corp. v. Vinyard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 19, 1953No. 34799PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

It is well settled that, when a hearing is sought for the purpose of increasing or decreasing compensation payable on the basis of a change of condition, the evidence must show a changed condition arising from future developments as distinguished from conditions existing at the time of the original award or settlement. Code § 114-709; Rourke v. United States Fidelity &c. Co., 187 Ga. 636 (1) (1 S. E. 2d 728); Moore v. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., 67 Ga. App. 259 (19 S. E. 2d 763). A settlement approved by the board, or an award, is conclusive on both the employer and employee as to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Austin Bros. Bridge Co. v. WhitmireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Home Accident Insurance v. McNairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Blue Bell Globe Manufacturing Co. v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Rourke v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Travelers Insurance Co. v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Carriers Insurance v. McConnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Davis v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API