Riegel Textile Corp. v. Vinyard
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
It is well settled that, when a hearing is sought for the purpose of increasing or decreasing compensation payable on the basis of a change of condition, the evidence must show a changed condition arising from future developments as distinguished from conditions existing at the time of the original award or settlement. Code § 114-709; Rourke v. United States Fidelity &c. Co., 187 Ga. 636 (1) (1 S. E. 2d 728); Moore v. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., 67 Ga. App. 259 (19 S. E. 2d 763). A settlement approved by the board, or an award, is conclusive on both the employer and employee as to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Austin Bros. Bridge Co. v. WhitmireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Home Accident Insurance v. McNairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Blue Bell Globe Manufacturing Co. v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Rourke v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Carriers Insurance v. McConnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Davis v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.