Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Murphy

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 24, 2002No. AC 22318PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, C. J.

The defendants, Karen A. Murphy and Kathleen A. Murphy, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, determining that a view easement exists over a portion of their property in favor of the plaintiff, Kenneth A. Schwartz, and granting a mandatory injunction ordering the defendants to maintain that easement in accordance with the *288court’s specifications. The principal issues on appeal are whether the court properly (1) determined that a view easement exists over the defendants’ property for the benefit of the plaintiffs property and (2)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Gager v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  3. Bolan v. Avalon Farms Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Castonguay v. PlourdeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. DiSorbo v. Grand Associates One Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Martinez v. ZovichConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. Simone v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Longmoor v. NilsenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
  4. Stefanoni v. DuncanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Torgerson v. Sarah Tuxis Residential Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API