Legal Opinion
Longmoor v. Nilsen
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 23, 2004No. 3:02CV1595(JBA)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Trooper Laboy, Trooper Hazen, Trooper Sweeney, and LT. Tolomeo [Doc. # 67]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Defendants Laboy, Hazen, Sweeney, and Tolomeo move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 for summary judgment on plaintiff Lorraine Longmoor’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims that they deprived her of equal protection and procedural due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and common law claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress. 1 For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion [Doc. # 67] is GRANTED…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sullivan v. SteinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Bennie Gray v. Matthew Goddu, Norwich Police Officer, et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- Castelare v. LopezDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Gawlik v. QuirosDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Jones v. BeckertDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.