Legal Opinion
In re A. Bruder & Son, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 1950PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFeoessel, J.
We are asked to determine, in this summary proceeding under section 25 of the General Corporation Law, which, if any, of two opposing slates of directors was validly elected at a meeting of the stockholders of A. Bruder & Son, Inc., held on January 3, 1950.
The facts are virtually undisputed. So far as pertinent here, we are told that the corporate appellant was organized on December 2, 1930, with an authorized capital stock of one hundred shares. It acquired the pawnbroker’s business formerly conducted by Abraham Bruder, who died in 1943, and whose widow is the respondent Bessie Bruder. His…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Petition of Argus Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- In re the Petition of Stockholders of Robert Clarke, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- In re the Election of Directors of Utica Fire Alarm Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Farmer v. A. D. Farmer & Son Type Founding Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- In re D. J. Salvator, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re the Election of Directors of William Faehndrich, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Flagg-Utica Corp. v. BaseliceNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Ohlstein v. Hillcrest Paper Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- In re KatzNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Teperman v. Atcos Baths, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.