Legal Opinion
Shurtliff v. Northwest Pools, Inc.
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1991No. 18596PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE
Karl and Peggy Shurtliff contracted with Northwest Pools, Inc. (Northwest) to have a pool built in their backyard. The total cost of the pool was $12,500. The Shurtliffs paid $6,250 when excavation began and agreed to pay the balance when the pool was finished. Unfortunately, the pool was not built to the size specified in the contract and was not completed in two weeks as Northwest had promised. The parties tried to negotiate a resolution to the dispute, but when that attempt was unsuccessful the Shurtliffs sued Northwest, claiming under I.C.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- William v. CenarrusaIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Matter of McNeelyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
- Chadderdon v. KingIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Decker v. Homeguard SystemsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bank of Idaho v. ColleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dennis I. Spencer Contractor, Inc. v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Litster Frost v. Idaho Injury Law GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- Wiggins v. Peachtree Settlement Funding (In Re Wiggins)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001
- Record Steel & Construction, Inc. v. Martel Construction, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.