Legal Opinion
Crichton v. Louisiana Highway Commission
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 22, 1931No. 31136PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.
The purpose of this suit is to restrain the Louisiana highway commission from changing the route of a certain highway, designated as No. 10 in Act No. 95 of the Extra Ses sion of 1921, as finally amended by Act No. 294 of 1928. Both the act of 1921 and that of 1928 provide that highway No. 10 shall begin at the Arkansas state line and run through Plain Dealing, Benton, Bossier City, Curtis, Taylortown, Crichton, Coushata, Gampti to Natchitoches.
In December, 1929, the highway commission let a contract for the building of what is known as project No. 1702, which is a portion of highway No. 10,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. Hackley, Hume & JoyceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Stringfellow v. Nowlin Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Arent v. Liquidating Com'rs of Bank of MonroeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Hart v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Hernsheim & Brother v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Texas Pipe Line Company v. BarbeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Parish of Iberia v. CookSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- Louisiana Highway Commission v. TreadawayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Louisiana Highway Commission v. Hays' HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.