Legal Opinion
Stringfellow v. Nowlin Bros.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 5, 1925No. 26586PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
This is a suit against a partnership and its individual members, originally alleged to have been five brothers. It was commenced by attachment and garnishment, on the ground of defendants’ nonresidence.
Defendants were never personally cited. A curator ad hoc was appointed to represent them. The garnishee answered that nothing was due defendants. The matter rested there, until defendants appeared'in court by their attorneys and moved to dissolve the attachment, denying they were nonresidents, •and alleging that the attachment bond was defective; at the same time defendants instituted a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
- McMasters v. PalmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1849
- David v. Municipality No. TwoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
- Bonner v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
- Barrow v. RobichauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Di Franco v. AscaniLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Mexic Bros., Inc. v. SauviacLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Pillsbury Mills, Inc. v. ChehardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
- Myers v. MaricelliLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.