ACCOUNTING PRINCIPALS, INC. v. Manpower, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TERENCE C. KERN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Disqualify Counsel (Doc. 20). For reasons set forth herein, the motion is granted, and the law firm of Crowe and Dunlevy (“Crowe & Dunlevy”) is disqualified from serving as counsel for Defendant Manpower, Inc. (“Manpower”).
I. Factual Background
Plaintiff Accounting Principals, Inc. (“API”) is a staffing company specializing in contract, contract to hire, and direct hire of accounting and finance professionals in the Tulsa employment market. On May 1, 2003, API and Defendant International Business…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Kenneth Wayne StigerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Leon G. Smith and Karen H. Smith v. D. Keith Whatcott, Phillip Taylor, Taywin, Inc., Taycor Ltd. And Burke ClowardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Weeks v. Independent School District No. I-89Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Slc Limited V, a California Limited Partnership v. Bradford Group West, Inc., a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Arkansas Valley State Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boone v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024
- Columbia Mutual Insurance Company v. Baloru Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024
- Grant v. Flying Bud Farms, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2022
- Jackson v. BOK Financial CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025
- Moore v. Metropolitan Tulsa Transit Authority, TheDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.