Legal Opinion
Haman v. Allied Concrete Products, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1972No. 1388PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
In this appeal, we are asked to overrule Gordon v. Burgess Construction Co., 425 P.2d 602 (Alaska 1967).
In the superior court John Haman and his wife brought suit against Allied Concrete and Modern Construction. The Ha-mans sought the recovery of compensatory and punitive damages against Allied Concrete under three separate counts. They alleged that Allied Concrete leased to Modern Construction an automatic concrete mixer which was mounted on a truck. It was further alleged that the drive chain which turned the rotating drum on the mixer broke and struck John Haman…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jackson v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Central R. of New Jersey v. ColasurdoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- Colasurdo v. Central R. R. of New JerseyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arctic Structures, Inc. v. WedmoreAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. PurdyAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Wright v. Action Vending Company, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Grothe v. OlafsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Burke v. Raven Electric, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.