Koppitz-Melchers Brewing Co. v. Behm
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Assumpsit by tbe Koppitz-Melchers Brewing Company against Adolph Behm for goods sold and for rent. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
The plaintiff, being owner of a building in the city of Detroit, rented it to the defendant for a grocery and saloon; and upon May 1, 1900, the defendant was in arrears about $135, according to plaintiff’s testimony. A new arrangement was then made, under which the defendant continued business until' the place was burned, on October 28, 1900. Under this arrangement plaintiff drew and delivered to the county treasurer its check for $500, and procured therefor a beer license, issued to itself, permitting it to sell beer upon the premises. This license was put up in the saloon conducted and…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Clark v. TinninArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Walhier v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Kay v. SpencerWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Simmer v. Cutter's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Marx v. Williamsburgh City Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.