Crestlawn Memorial Park Assn. v. Sobieski
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, P. J.—
Appeals in two separate proceedings for writs of mandate were consolidated by stipulation of counsel who agreed that a single opinion might be written covering both appeals. Although relating essentially to the same subject matter and the same controversy they are not dependent upon the determination of an equity action considered concurrently therewith. (Sheppard, et al., plaintiffs and respondents, v. Bay A. Wilcox, et al., defendants and appellants, * post, p. 53 [26 Cal.Rptr. 412].) Since the latter case in an action to declare a constructive trust it will be referred to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Sale v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bruce v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Giannini Controls Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Sheppard v. WilcoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- N. C. Roberts Co. v. Topaz Transformer Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.