Legal Opinion
Adamy v. Parkhurst
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 31, 1932No. 6215PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
For many years prior to September, 1930, appellee Parkhurst had been a resident of Reed City, Mich.. During that month, however, he departed for the state of California with the intent and purpose of making his home there. About a year later he was indicted in the Western District of Michigan for violation of the federal banking laws, and in November, 1931, be was removed from California to Michigan to answer to such indictment. Shortly after his arrival in Michigan, that is, on December 2, 1931, ho secured bail and gave bond for his subsequent appearance. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Netograph Manufacturing Co. v. . ScrughamNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Church v. ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
- Kaufman v. GarnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grant v. GuernseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Alla v. KornfeldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1949
- Estate of Ungar v. Palestinian AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- State ex rel. Stipec v. OwenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Chambliss v. HaeberleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940